Posts Tagged ‘ROI’

BPM is a Matter of Survival

The folks at Appian recently released a copy of a research note from Gartner, Inc. I have included a copy of it in the Files section of this blog. The key findings are listed below.

Key Findings

  • Companies that use BPM create business process models that identify process redundancies, hidden costs and avoidable risks. Companies survive by using cost savings from BPM efforts to fund critical business operations.
  • Applying BPM enables process visibility, allowing better collaboration among the activities being performed.
  • For struggling companies, compliance is often another burden. BPM is well-suited to drive costs out of compliance and regulatory work.
  • Simplifying the administrative work of your employees can increase morale and enable them to spend time on high-value work. It can also help companies in survival mode do more with less.

Recommendations

  • Gain a competency in BPM now.
  • Before you wield the cost-cutting axe, construct a high-level business process model to understand the impact of head count and resource cuts across the enterprise so that you do not decrease process efficiency and inadvertently drive up costs.
  • Use BPM to manage your business case justification and measurement processes.
  • Identify processes where costs may be high and there is not a focus on measurement. Target one of these processes for your first or next BPM project, and demonstrate tangible results.
     

Survival Actions

Put BPM to work immediately: 

  • Identify your most-valuable business processes.
  • Select from that set the business processes necessary for survival and where money may be wasted.
  • Target one of these processes for your first or next BPM project. 

BPM can be a powerful tool that plays a critical role in the survival of your company — it can reduce costs, ensure compliance, avoid mistakes and create the visibility needed to manage processes as assets to your enterprise. Initial projects can produce impressive results. You cannot, however, simply focus on one-off projects. You will need to assess the impact of cuts to the process overall, not just isolation in one area. To scale and integrate BPM into the fabric of your organization requires attending to the discipline of BPM and putting the constructs in place to support the practice of BPM. Although much of the survival work will focus on projects that generate significant results, resources must also be allocated to communicating and making BPM repeatable and scalable. For step-by-step information about building an effective BPM program. 

When building a BPM program, be sure to pay attention to some critical elements: 

  1. Build communication into your BPM work to address the cultural and political implications that will arise.
  2. Start up the business process competency center to ensure that your efforts will scale.
  3. Prove the results by doing several short-duration, high-impact projects.
  4. Educate your organization about BPM — build the skill set, and strive to embed continuous process improvement into everyone’s job. 

Laying the groundwork for BPM and proving results are powerful and can become a platform to elevate BPM to its true potential — BPM as one of the strategic management disciplines — and enable your organization to move from using BPM to survive to helping your organization to thrive. 

StrAIT Advisors recommendations 

This research note includes some specific savings example, which is always helpful and should be valuable to you as well. I recommend that you take these observations and recommendations seriously. For those of us that have been around a while, we remember recessions past. As usual, there were many jobs lost. And as usual, as the economy recovered many companies found their experience inventory in core areas had been depleted. This lack of experience where it was needed most seriously hurt those companies. It took them years to recover. 

Download a copy of this research note and share it within your organization. It’s clear, direct and important.

20% Savings! Really?

Originally posted on 7/15/09.

 

Recently, I read an article by Gartner with a title referring to a 20% cost savings in the first year after a BPM project. Being in the BPM consulting business, I was delighted with the title alone and have included a version of the article provided by ebizQ in the Files section on my Resources page. It can also be found on the ebizQ site at http://www.ebizq.net/news/11095.html?rss . If you’re a Gartner Group client you should check out their article directly at www.garter.com . I’m sure it will be more detailed. Obviously, one of Gartner’s motivations for publishing this information so that it’s available to folks who are not Gartner customers was to drive interest in one of their BPM summits. That’s not a problem for me if the information is useful and accurate. I do think this information is useful and accurate. By no means do I think that those savings claims will be true for everyone. I do think that the pursuit of improving BPM for any company will lead to impressive results. If I didn’t I wouldn’t be investing in a business to help clients get there.

 

I do differ on one of their points. The article states that organizations which adopt BPM without establishing a business process competency center find their efforts don’t deliver the promised results. I ran manufacturing organizations, process technology organizations and IT organizations for many years. Based on firsthand experience and observation in the real manufacturing world I believe that BPM has to be at the core of the manufacturing or service organizations to be sustainable, not in an external group. Sustainability is the key. I believe that the client is best served if, instead, they have what I call a Business Process Architect. That should be a person on the client’s succession plan to be the COO and have significant leverage or ownership in the company’s operations (service or manufacturing) organizations. That person doesn’t need a competency center.

 

Other than that one point, I think this article has merit. Consistent with this article, our SLR methodology strives to institutionalize a continuous improvement mindset broken down in to two distinct parts. First, the step change component which is the combination of RUP and Lean approaches and an ongoing Six Sigma type continuous improvement component. Both become must a part of the corporate culture and be sustained. This ends the overt StrAIT Advisors pitch for this post.

 

I believe that most of the points made in this article are worthwhile so Gartner gets gold stars from me. I hope you found this post to be valuable. See you next time…

Categories
Archives